⌚ The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s

Thursday, December 09, 2021 7:40:53 PM

The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s

He and his family were lucky; The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s the only The Crucible Play Vs Play they had to buy The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s barter for were flour, The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s and salt; pins and needles; and shoes, thread and maybe some cloth although many a farm kid went to school in a dress, shirt The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s even underpants made of flour Why Are Miranda Rights Important printed with a flowered pattern. During roughly this same period, farm employment declined dramatically -- The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s Socialist enterprises kolkhozes and sovkhozes were producing the The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s of almost all types of agricultural produce, and in fact, the socialist system had become the only form of organization in Soviet agriculture. Strana Sovetov za 50 let: Sb. Accessed 25 Apr. Their Catcher In The Rye Loss Analysis The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s on deaf ears, though, as the rest of the nation -- particularly urban areas The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s enjoyed the prosperity of the cannabis advantages and disadvantages. The The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s Midwest has some of the richest soil in the world.

Why Agriculture Was So Important - Unit 7: Big History Project - OER Project

In fact, raw materials are so important in production that the economic health of a country strongly depends on how many raw materials it possesses. Currently, the EU is the first trader of agricultural products in the world, both for imports and exports. Speaking of trade, developing countries still get most of their national income from agricultural exports. In developing countries, agricultural jobs help reduce high rates of unemployment.

When it comes to reducing poverty, evidence shows that focusing on agriculture is significantly more effective than investing in other areas. When trade, national revenue, and employment are combined in a positive way, a country enjoys reduced poverty and boosted economic growth. Agriculture possesses the power to harm or heal. When farmers prioritize biodiversity on their land, it benefits the earth. Having more biodiversity results in healthier soil, less erosion, better water conservation, and healthier pollinators. This is all good news for the environment as a whole, making agriculture an important part of the cycle of life. Throughout history, the need for land to grow food fueled many conflicts. No matter where or what you are eating, the ingredients in your meals came from somewhere.

All roads lead to agriculture. When agriculture thrives, fewer people go hungry. Through artificial intelligence , blockchain software, gene manipulation, and more, scientists and farmers have been figuring out ways to increase crop productivity, use less water, and reduce negative impacts on the environment. Twenty-five thousand advanced workers were sent from the cities on permanent assignment to kolkhoz work the Twenty-five Thousanders. Factory collectives sponsored particular kolkhozes. The party emphatically condemned the position of the leaders of the right-wing deviation, N. Bukharin, A. Rykov, and M. Tomskii, who advocated slowing the rate of industrialization, opposed the accelerated formation of kolkhozes, and called for an end to extraordinary measures to combat the kulaks.

It was vitally important that the kolkhoz movement in the USSR find an organizational form in which the interests of socialized agriculture and those of the individual peasants would coincide. The practical experience of socialist construction in the USSR had brought the agricultural artel to the fore as the main form of kolkhoz. In the artel, land, labor, and all the basic means of production were socialized, but kolkhoz members retained as personal property their homes, small tools, some productive livestock a maximum number was established in the Regulations for Agricultural Artels , and a small plot of land adjacent to their homes for personal use.

In a decision of , On the Pace of Collectivization and State Measures to Assist the Development of Kolkhozes, the Central Committee of the ACP B oriented local party organizations and Soviet agencies toward the substantial completion of collectivization by the end of the five-year plan in The pace of collectivization outlined in the decision took into account the diversity of conditons in different regions of the country and the extent to which the peasants were prepared to enter the kolkhozes.

It was noted that collectivization in such major grain-growing areas as the lower and middle Volga regions and the Northern Caucasus could be basically completed by autumn or spring The decision emphasized the need to combat all attempts to delay the development of the kolkhoz movement on the grounds of shortages of tractors and complex machines. In the winter of —30 in the race to achieve rapid rates of collectivization, violations of the principle of voluntary entry into the kolkhoz were committed. Often, communes were established instead of artels. In some cases, middle peasants were subjected to dekulakization. Excesses and distortions provoked dissatisfaction among the peasantry, who began to slaughter cattle on a massive scale. The hastily formed kolkhozes had no stability and quickly fell apart.

The Communist Party and Soviet government took decisive steps to correct the situation in the countryside. In the second half of February the Central Committee of the Communist Party issued instructions that undue haste in carrying out collectivization was impermissible, that dekulakization must be stopped where total collectivization had not yet begun, and that special consideration must be given to local conditions in the national republics.

On Mar. In August the kolkhozes included State aid to the kolkhozes was increased. By the end of , the kolkhozes surpassed the individually owned farms in area cultivated and in yield and were able to provide their members with more grain and other products than the individual farmers had. This helped to change the attitude of the mass of the peasants toward the kolkhoz. In Soviet history has gone down as the year when socialism unfurled an offensive on all fronts. The essence of the offensive in agriculture was the formation of production cooperatives among the peasantry and the liquidation, on that basis, of the last exploiting class, the kulaks.

Total collectivization and the development of the sovkhozes created the necessary material base for replacing the agricultural products provided by kulak households with the products of the kolkhozes and sovkhozes, making the liquidation of the kulaks as a class economically possible. Total collectivization was accompanied by a bitter class struggle in the countryside. The kulaks actively resisted the formation of kolkhozes, terrorized and even killed activists in the kolkhoz movement, ruined equipment, slaughtered livestock, and burned down buildings. In the course of collectivization the kulaks were expropriated.

The Sixteenth Congress of the ACP B , which was held in , evaluated the results of the first stage of total collectivization and made plans for the next stage. The resolutions of the congress declared that the basic conditions for the further development of collectivization were broad organizational, material, and financial aid to the kolkhozes, the organization of the MTS machine and tractor station system, the training of kolkhoz cadres, the strengthening of the kolkhozes, and increased production by them. The joint Plenum of the Central Committee and Central Control Commission of the ACP B , which was held in December , resolved that the basic collectivization of agriculture that is, the bringing of at least 80 percent of the peasantry into kolkhozes would be completed in in the Northern Caucasus, the lower and middle Volga regions, and the steppe regions of the Ukrainian SSR.

In the other grain-growing regions, the kolkhozes were to include 50 percent of the households, and in the consuming regions, 20—25 percent of the grain-growing households. In the cotton-growing and sugar-beet-growing regions and, on the average, in all branches of agriculture throughout the country, at least 50 percent of the peasant households were to be drawn into the kolkhozes. By June there were , kolkhozes made up of 13 million peasant households The successes in collectivization and in the organizational and economic consolidation of the first kolkhozes were achieved owing to the creation of a strong tractor and agricultural machinery industry in the USSR.

Assembly-line production of wheeled tractors was organized in at the Krasnyi Putilovets Plant now the Leningrad Kirov Plant. Other tractor plants were put into operation in Stalingrad in , in Kharkov in , and in Cheliabinsk in When collectivization was first undertaken, tractors for Soviet agriculture came primarily from abroad, but in the USSR stopped importing tractors. During the first five-year plan alone —32 , Soviet agriculture was equipped with , tractors, of which 94, were made in the USSR. The opening of these plants made it possible to reequip the kolkhozes and sovkhozes during collectivization. In , , tractors horsepower units and 14, combine harvesters were being used in Soviet agriculture, and in , , tractors and , combine harvesters.

In the government established the MTS system, which played an extremely important organizational role in the struggle for the socialist reorganization of rural life and in strengthening the alliance between the working class and the peasantry. For many years the MTS system served the production and technology needs of the kolkhozes and helped them to strengthen the socialized economy. Numerous cadres specializing in the mechanization of agriculture were trained in the MTS system. Collectivization forever delivered the countryside from kulak bondage, from class differentiation, ruin, and poverty.

During collectivization the rational organizational forms of production, labor, accounting, and distribution were clarified. In evaluating the experience of the kolkhozes an important role was played by all-Union conferences on the organization of production and labor in the kolkhoz —32 , whose recommendations laid the basis for the resolutions of the Sixth Congress of Soviets of the USSR in March Also important were the decision on the organizational and economic consolidation of the kolkhozes, which was issued on Feb.

For example, the kulaks had been liquidated, the roots of capitalism had been extirpated, thus ensuring the victory of socialism in the countryside, and the kolkhozes had become a solid support for socialist construction. Socialist enterprises kolkhozes and sovkhozes were producing the bulk of almost all types of agricultural produce, and in fact, the socialist system had become the only form of organization in Soviet agriculture. The Model Regulations for the Agricultural Artel adopted by the Second All-Union Congress of Kolkhoz Shock Workers in generalized and gave legal form to the new relations in the countryside, establishing the legal foundations for the kolkhoz sector of the economy and the main principles for the orgaization of production and public life in the kolkhozes.

With the adoption of the new regulations by the kolkhozes —36 , the kolkhoz system became fully established. A new class—the kolkhoz peasantry—was formed, and gradually the new psychology of the peasant-worker of socialist society took shape. The socialist transformation of agriculture opened the way for increased agricultural output and for a steady improvement in the material and cultural standard of living of the peasantry. The kolkhoz system that was created through the collectivization of agriculture made it possible to supply the army and the population with food and industry with raw materials without interruption during the Great Patriotic War — Because of the kolkhoz system the damage done to agriculture during the war was quickly repaired, and the level of production was matched as early as Between and a collectivization policy was implemented in the western parts of the Ukraine, Byelorussia, and Moldavia and in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, which had become part of the USSR before the war.

As a result, the number of kolkhozes decreased, but their economic power increased. Thus, in there were , kolkhozes in the country; in , 93,; and in , 32, The kolkhozes and sovkhozes have demonstrated their viability through many years of experience and development. They have accumulated a great deal of experience in large-scale mechanized agricultural production. Contemporary kolkhozes are large-scale agricultural enterprises equipped with advanced technology and provided with skilled cadres. Guaranteed minimum payments for labor have been introduced in the kolkhozes, and a pension insurance system has been established for older, retired members. Intensive agricultural production, mechanization, electrification, and the use of chemicals have fundamentally changed the conditions of labor, so that they now approximate the conditions of labor in industry.

In more than 2 million skilled machine operators and approximately , specialists with higher or secondary education were working on the kolkhozes. The Third All-Union Congress of Kolkhoz Workers, which was held in , discussed important problems related to the further development of the kolkhozes and to the acceleration of the increase in agricultural production. The congress adopted new Model Regulations for the Kolkhozes, which reflected the great social and economic changes that had taken place in the kolkhoz village since the Second Congress of Kolkhoz Shock Workers.

The regulations marked a new stage in the development of the kolkhoz system and pointed the way toward developing kolkhoz democracy, improving the forms and methods of management in the socialized economy, making the kolkhozes more economical, and making better use of the land, the chief means of production in agriculture. Collectivization in the USSR was the first socioeconomic effort in the world aimed at fundamentally changing the conditions of labor and existence and the entire way of life of many millions of peasants. From a political point of view the kolkhoz system strengthened the Soviet state and its main foundation— the alliance between the workers and peasants.

From an economic point of view, it made it possible to develop agriculture on a modern industrial basis. From a social point of view, it freed the toiling peasantry from exploitation and poverty and made possible the establishment in the countryside of a new system of social relations, which will lead to the complete transcendence of class differences in Soviet society. Thus, the kolkhoz system contains vast potential for developing the productive forces of the countryside, transforming agricultural labor into a variety of industrial labor, and overcoming the essential distinctions between town and countryside.

The collectivization of agriculture has created the necessary conditions for the transition from socialism to communism. The victory of the kolkhoz system in the USSR has worldwide historical significance, for the experience of the socialist transformation of Soviet agriculture in the USSR has been creatively applied in the other socialist countries, as well as in developing countries following a noncapitalist path. The idea of establishing cooperatives has also become very attractive to the toiling peasants in capitalist countries, encouraging them to intensify the revolutionary struggle for emancipation from the yoke of the monopolies.

The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia

Inspector calls social responsibility products like sugar, tea, rice, spices, tobacco, The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s, etc. Lee, Harper. In the The Importance Of Agriculture In The 1930s a considerable portion of the means of production continued to be privately owned.